Key result
Elevated inflammatory markers link to higher 90-day mortality or HF readmission in acute HF.
Why the study?
Do elevated inflammatory biomarkers (RDW, NLR, MLR, PLR) predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
Observational (n=8,127)
No
Do elevated inflammatory biomarkers (RDW, NLR, MLR, PLR) predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
The combined assessment of routine blood cell count-derived inflammatory biomarkers (RDW, NLR, MLR, PLR) provides valuable prognostic information for 90-day outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.
Background Inflammatory processes are increasingly recognised as pivotal in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and several inflammatory biomarkers have emerged as potential tools for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with chronic HF. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are easy to obtain, inexpensive and rapidly available through routine blood tests. Their combined assessment may represent a valuable tool for predicting prognosis in the context of acute heart failure (AHF). Aims To assess the prognostic utility of RDW, NLR, MLR and PLR in a cohort of inpatients with AHF. Methods In this single-centre, observational study, data from patients admitted to our hospital between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2023 were retrospectively collected. AHF was diagnosed according to the updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines. RDW, NLR, MLR and PLR measurements were considered elevated if values exceeded 14.6%, 2, 0.4 and 137, respectively. Participants were stratified into five cohorts according to the number of increased biomarkers reported (none, 1, 2, 3, or 4). Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic measurements were assessed for each group. Independent predictors of RDW, NLR, MLR and PLR were identified using linear regression analysis and the association between different cohorts and outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. The outcomes were the composite of all-cause mortality or readmission due to heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality at 90 days after discharge. Results A total of 8,127 patients, aged 81 years, of whom 4,312 (53%) men, were enrolled. Only 260 (3%) participants had normal biomarker levels, while 1,031 (13%), 1,717 (21%), 2,654 (33%) and 2,465 (30%) had 1, 2, 3 or all biomarkers elevated, respectively. Patients with higher biomarker levels were older, more likely to be male, had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and exhibited greater N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements. RDW, NLR, MLR and PLR were found to be independent predictors of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality or rehospitalisation due to HF, as well as all-cause mortality. Compared with the cohort of patients with all normal biomarkers, those with increased biomarker levels presented a greater risk of developing adverse events, both in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions RDW, NLR, MLR and PLR are frequently elevated in patients diagnosed with acute HF. Each biomarker independently predicts adverse events and their combination may be adopted as a valid tool to provide prognostic information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iaconelli et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute heart failure (n=8,127). Elevated RDW, NLR, MLR, and PLR vs. Normal biomarker levels was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or readmission due to heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality at 90 days after discharge. Elevated levels of RDW, NLR, MLR, and PLR (present in 97% of patients) were independent predictors of 90-day all-cause mortality or heart failure readmission in acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: