Key result
Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.45) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure.
Why the study?
NLR and PLR have proved to be potential outcome predictors in cardiovascular diseases, prompting investigation into their predictive value in detecting HF and their impact on morbidity and mortality.
Do elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict heart failure diagnosis, morbidity, and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Observational (n=100)
No
Do elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict heart failure diagnosis, morbidity, and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.45 (95% CI 1.22–3.22)
p-value: p=0.04
NLR and PLR are inexpensive, widely available biomarkers that independently predict mortality and rehospitalization in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Elevated NLR and PLR may aid mortality risk stratification in decompensated HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Objective Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which are new inflammatory markers, inexpensive, widely available, and obtained from routinely used test (complete blood count), have proved to be potential predictors of outcome in many cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of NLR and PLR in detecting HF and their effect on morbidity and mortality of patients with heart failure (HF). Patients and methods This prospective study included 60 patients diagnosed with acute decompensated HF and 40 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls. Echocardiography was done for all participants to assess cardiac function. All participants were tested for biochemical parameters (urea, creatinine, and liver function tests). Complete blood count with calculation of NLR and PLR was done for all participants. Then all cases were followed up for occurrence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular complications, history of hospitalization, and death during the period of the study. Results NLR and PLR of patients were significantly higher than controls (P<0.02 and <0.03, respectively). There was an inverse correlation between both PLR and NLR and left ventricular ejection fraction of the study population (P<0.01 and <0.02, respectively). PLR had 70% sensitivity and 47% specificity for prediction of HF with cutoff point more than 186, whereas NLR had 97% sensitivity and 47% specificity for prediction of HF with cutoff point more than 3.56. Moreover, PLR had 83% sensitivity and 58% specificity for prediction of mortality in those patients with decompensated HF with cutoff point more than 175, whereas NLR had 92% sensitivity and 33% specificity for prediction of mortality in those patients with decompensated HF with cutoff point more than 3.56, with average 1-year follow-up. Conclusion NLR and PLR are cheap, widely available inflammatory biomarkers that can be used to predict morbidity and mortality in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashry et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute decompensated heart failure (n=100). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Prediction of mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure (NLR) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.22-3.22, p=0.04). Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR 1.45) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio were identified as independent risk factors for mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: