Why the study?
This analysis aimed to assess heart rate control and the use of rate-controlling drugs in heart failure patients in the modern era.
Does elevated presentation heart rate predict mortality in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=1,422)
Yes
Does elevated presentation heart rate predict mortality in patients with heart failure?
In a nationwide Polish registry of heart failure patients, elevated presentation heart rate was common and significantly predicted 16-month mortality.
Presentation heart rate may refine HF prognosis but should not yet change practice; leaves open whether intensified rate control improves survival.
Aim HEart failuRe ObsErvational Study of the Polish Cardiac Society (HEROES) is a prospective, multi-center, observational all-comers study aimed to assess clinical profile of heart failure (HF) pts (patients) in a representative national sample (41 centers). This analysis reports aspects of heart rate (HR) control and rate control drugs use in the modern era (2022-24). Methods Analysis of eCRF prospectively collected data from 1422 out-pts and in-pts (median age 69, IQR 60-76, 28.6% females) with complete 16 months follow-up (median: 485 days, interquartile range: 397–599 days) providing 16.2% (231/1422) mortality rate. The cohort included HFrEF/mrEF/pEF subgroups (heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, preserved ejection fraction: 59/ 14/ 27%). Among the analyzed 1168 non-paced patients 36% were in atrial fibrillation (AF). Results Median recorded HR at presentation was 77 beats per minute, bpm (IQR 67-90), higher in pts in AF (85 bpm; IQR 75-100 vs 75 bpm; IQR 65-85 in sinus rhythm, p<0.0001) and in hospitalized pts (80 bpm, IQR70-92) than in in-pts (70 bpm; 64-89, p<0.0001). Baseline use of beta-adrenolytics was 80% (increasing to 95% at discharge) and ivabradine was used in 4% (increase to 5%), amiodarone in 11% and digitalis in 8.5%. Only 59% of outpatients in sinus rhythm presented with baseline HR=<70 and lenient control in AF was adequate. Discharge HR improved to 70 bpm (IQR 65-80), higher in pts in AF (75 bpm; IQR 66-82 vs 70 bpm; IQR 63-78 in sinus rhythm, p<0.0001). Presentation heart rate was predictive for mortality, effect driven by in-pts and pts insinus rhythm. Logistic regression showed 1% excess mortality risk per 1bpm increase in presentation HR. Kaplan-Meier curves analysis showed hazard ratio of 1.5 (p=0.0045) for dying in pts with snapshot HR>82 at presentation. For in-pts prediction cutoff was identified at admission HR >73bpm (HR=1.33 with borderline significance). Pts with HFpEF showed most significant relationship of presentation heart rate and mortality (logistic regression p=0.0004 vs p=0.12 for HFmrEF and p=0.55 for HFpEF). Presentation HR correlated with serum NT-proBNP (r=0.24, p<0.001) and inversely with KCCQ score (r=0.25, p<0.001). Conclusions Among the Polish patients from snapshot HEROES registry accelerated heart rate is common, correlating with worse Nt-proBNP and quality of life. HR at presentation is weakly but significantly related with total 16-months mortality with optimal cutoff >82bpm for entire cohort and sinus rhythm pts, and with >73bpm for hospitalized pts. Elevated heart rate was a remarkable predictor of mortality in the subset of patients with preserved ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasprzak et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=1,422). Heart rate was evaluated on Mortality (HR 1.5, p=0.0045).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: