Normative-legal analysis reveals tax reform inadequately addresses innovation incentives in Brazil's intangible economy.
Brazil’s tax reform, established by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 and regulated by Complementary Law 214/2025, modernizes its fiscal structure but fails to establish a cohesive strategy for the intangible economy. Through a normative-legal and policy analysis, this article examines how the omission of an IP box regime and the introduction of new consumption tax burdens (Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços/Contribuição sobre Bens e Serviços) on IP commercialization affect the capture of IP value, location of intangibles and innovation incentives. Drawing on the economic framework for intangible capital, our analysis finds that the reform creates a severe misalignment between innovation policy and taxation. Sectoral asymmetries, such as preserving constitutional immunity for the book industry while increasing taxes for high-growth sectors like electronic games, weaken IP incentives and Brazil’s international competitiveness, exacerbating existing policy challenges for the intangible economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carls et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: