This systematic review evaluates EEG biomarkers for cognitive impairment in individuals, suggesting their potential for early diagnosis.
Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) accounts for the majority of dementia-related disorders among aging populations. Given the irreversible nature of AD, early detection of cognitive impairment is critical for improving prognosis and facilitating timely interventions before individuals meet the clinical criteria for AD. Objective The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of recent advances in task-based electroencephalography (EEG), such as using attention and inhibitory control tasks, which has recently emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for assessing neurophysiological alterations associated with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of task-based EEG biomarkers in distinguishing cognitively impaired individuals from those without impairment. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and SpringerLink databases for studies published between 2017 and 2024. Results Findings indicate consistent neurophysiological alterations in MCI and AD, particularly reductions in event-related potential amplitudes and prolonged latencies, with P3 abnormalities observed in about half of the studies assessing selective attention and inhibitory control. Similarly, a comparable number of studies using working memory tasks report disrupted functional connectivity patterns, increased low-frequency oscillations (delta and theta activity), and reduced fast oscillations (alpha and beta activity). Conclusions These EEG-based indices demonstrate potential as objective biomarkers for detecting neural alterations associated with cognitive decline in both AD and preclinical dementia stages. Further research is needed to standardize EEG protocols and validate their clinical utility for early diagnosis and disease progression monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripanpitak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: