Key result
Nanoformulated linseed oil suppresses ROS formation and inflammatory markers in CAD patient monocytes.
Why the study?
Does nanoformulated linseed oil reduce pro-inflammatory M1 polarization and ROS formation in monocytes from healthy donors and CAD patients?
Does nanoformulated linseed oil reduce pro-inflammatory M1 polarization and ROS formation in monocytes from healthy donors and CAD patients?
Nanoformulated linseed oil reverses pro-inflammatory M1 macrophage polarization and reduces oxidative stress in monocytes from patients with coronary artery disease in vitro.
Introduction The development of atherosclerosis underlying coronary artery disease (CAD, a major cause of death worldwide) is promoted by infiltrating inflammatory cells including M1 macrophages and subtypes of T and B lymphocytes. Omega-3 fatty acids have shown promise in mitigating inflammation and enhancing the resolution of inflammatory responses, in part, by reducing M1 polarization of macrophages. Native linseed oil contains 55 % (v/v) of alpha linolenic acid, a plant derived omega-3 fatty acid. Aim Study the impact of stabilized nanoformulated (NF) linseed oil (25% w/w) containing 13.75% (w/w) alpha linolenic acid on the resolution of M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages using THP-1 cells and monocytes from healthy donors and CAD patients. Methods THP-1 cells were polarized towards M1 macrophages by TNF-α+IL-6 (10 ng/ml) for 48 h. Monocytes isolated from blood samples of either healthy donors (n=10) or CAD patients (n=15) were also studied. Gene expression levels were evaluated using RT-qPCR, protein levels by Western blot analysis, cytokines release by ELISA, and the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation using dihydroethidium (DHE) staining. Results THP-1 cells and freshly isolated monocytes from healthy donors exposed to TNF-α+IL-6 (10 ng/ml) for 24-48 h were polarized towards M1 macrophages with increased protein levels of M1 markers (CD86, iNOS), levels of ROS (83.8 ± 2.8 and 40.9 ± 2.8 A.U., respectively) and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α). Exposure of polarized M1 THP-1 cells and human monocytes to NF linseed oil but not NF corn oil for 24 h resulted in concentration-dependent reductions in ROS formation, mRNA and protein expression levels of markers of inflammation (IL-6, IL-1β, CD86), adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1), procoagulant responses (tissue factor), remodeling (MMP-9), and calcification (RUNX2). Monocytes isolated from CAD patients showed higher levels of ROS (54.4 ± 4.2 A.U.) under basal conditions compared to TNF-a+IL-6 activated monocytes from healthy donors that was reduced by NF linseed oil (0.003%). NF linseed oil (0.003%) treatment of monocytes from CAD patients (n=8), expressing high levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, had reduced levels of markers of inflammation (IL-6, TNF-α, CD86), procoagulant (tissue factor), pro-oxidant (p47phox, ACE1) and pro-remodeling (MMP-9) responses after 24 h. Conclusion The findings indicate that M1 polarization of THP-1 cells and healthy human monocytes is associated with increased levels of ROS and induction of pro-inflammatory responses. Both effects were reversed by NF linseed oil. Monocytes isolated from CAD patients showed an activated state with increased levels of ROS and pro-inflammatory markers that were reversed by NF linseed oil. Thus, NF linseed oil appears as an interesting approach to reverse M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages, hence, may contribute to reduce the burden of low-grade inflammation in patients with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hmadeh et al. (2025) studied Coronary artery disease (n=25). Nanoformulated linseed oil vs. Nanoformulated corn oil or basal conditions was evaluated on ROS formation and expression levels of markers of inflammation, adhesion, procoagulant responses, remodeling, and calcification. Nanoformulated linseed oil reduced ROS formation and markers of inflammation, procoagulant, and pro-remodeling responses in M1 polarized THP-1 cells and monocytes from CAD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: