Key result
Empagliflozin cuts ventricular arrhythmias ~36% and reduces appropriate ICD shocks in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Empagliflozin demonstrates cardiovascular benefits in HF, but its effects on ventricular arrhythmias and ICD therapies remain unclear.
Does empagliflozin reduce ventricular arrhythmias and ICD therapies in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Systematic Review (n=463)
Does empagliflozin reduce ventricular arrhythmias and ICD therapies in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 28%
Empagliflozin may provide anti-arrhythmic benefits by significantly reducing ventricular arrhythmias and the need for ICD therapies in patients with HFrEF.
May reduce VA episodes and ICD shocks in HFrEF with ICDs; low-certainty evidence from mixed studies leaves larger RCTs open.
Background & Objectives Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in heart failure (HF), but its effects on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies remain unclear. This systematic review evaluates the impact of empagliflozin on VA burden and ICD-related outcomes in HF patients. Methods A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing empagliflozin in HF patients with ICDs. Primary outcomes included ventricular arrhythmia episodes, appropriate ICD shocks, and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy. Results Four studies (three RCTs, one retrospective) comprising 463 HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were included. The EMPA-ICD trial (n=118) reported a 35% reduction in VA episodes over 24 weeks, with 18% of empagliflozin-treated patients experiencing VAs compared to 28% in the control group. Another study (n=220) found a 32% lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks in the empagliflozin group (14% vs. 21%). ATP interventions were also reduced by 29% in empagliflozin-treated patients. Empagliflozin was also associated with improved heart rate variability parameters; a 22% reduction in late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI, and lower serum biomarkers of myocardial fibrosis, including galectin-3 and ST2 as reported by EMPEROR-Preserved trial. Conclusions Empagliflozin is associated with a lower incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD interventions in HF patients, suggesting a potential anti-arrhythmic benefit. Larger, long-term trials are needed to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunjul et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n=463). Empagliflozin vs. Control was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmia episodes. Empagliflozin reduced ventricular arrhythmia episodes (18% vs 28%) and appropriate ICD shocks (14% vs 21%) in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: