Key result
FIND-AF Taiwan machine learning model outperforms existing clinical scores in predicting incident AF hospitalization.
Why the study?
It was unknown how prediction models for incident AF predict AF hospitalisation, and how AF hospitalisation risk relates to cardio-renal hospitalisations and death.
Does the FIND-AF Taiwan model improve prediction of incident AF hospitalisation compared to existing risk scores in a Taiwanese population?
Cohort (n=103,321)
No
Does the FIND-AF Taiwan model improve prediction of incident AF hospitalisation compared to existing risk scores in a Taiwanese population?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.792 (95% CI 0.777-0.807)
A newly developed machine learning model (FIND-AF Taiwan) outperformed existing clinical risk scores in predicting incident AF hospitalisation, which strongly correlated with subsequent cardio-renal events and mortality.
May support AF risk stratification in Taiwanese adults ≥50; extends prior models yet leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Background Prediction models have been developed and/or validated to identify individuals at risk of AF in the community,1 including through the use of machine learning.2 AF hospitalisation may be a more important outcome to predict, as it is associated with adverse events and health costs.3 4 It is unknown how prediction models developed and/or validated for incident AF prediction predict hospitalisation with AF, and how AF hospitalisation risk is associated with other cardio-renal hospitalisations and death. Purpose To test prediction models developed and/or validated for AF for the outcomes of AF hospitalisation in a Taiwanese population, develop a new model, and investigate association of higher predicted AF hospitalisation risk with cardio-renal hospitalisations and death. Methods The study population was derived from the National Taiwan University Hospital Integrated Medical Database. We included patients aged ≥50 years who were seen at NTUH between 01/01/2014-31/12/2019 without known AF or atrial flutter. Comorbidities were identified using ICD-10 codes. We divided the dataset 8:2 into training and testing cohorts We developed a new random forest model using the original FIND-AF variables (FIND-AF Taiwan) and evaluated performance in the testing dataset with internal bootstrap validation with 200 samples and conducted internal validation. We compared prediction performance compared with CHA2DS2-VASc, C2HEST, and FIND-AF. We then calculated the cumulative incidence rate for heart failure, stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by FIND-AF Taiwan risk stratification. Results A final cohort of 103,321 patients (mean age 64.6 (10.6) years, 52.8% women) was included in the analysis, with 4544 new cases of AF at 5 years. Prediction performance for AF hospitalisation was only moderate for FIND-AF (AUC 0.687, 95% CI 0.669-0.706), CHA2DS2VASc (AUC 0. 679, 95% CI 0.661-0.697) and C2HEST (AUC 0. 679, 95% CI 0.662-0.697). The derived FIND-AF Taiwan model had superior prediction performance (AUC 0.792, 95% CI 0.777-0.807) (Table 1). When stratified by FIND-AF Taiwan, patients with higher-predicted AF risk had a higher hazard for AF hospitalisation (unadjusted HR 7.5, 95% 4.7-11.9) but also for heart failure hospitalisation (HR 49.0, 95% CI 31.1-77.8), TIA or ischaemic stroke (HR 17, 13.7-21.8), moderate to severe CKD (HR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8-4.2). Patients at higher predicted AF risk also had higher hazard for cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.88-1.98) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36), in comparison with lower risk patients. (Figure 1) Conclusion A machine learning algorithm developed for the Taiwanese population has superior prediction performance for incident AF hospitalisation, and higher AF hospitalisation risk is associated with adverse cardio-renal outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=103,321). FIND-AF Taiwan model vs. CHA2DS2-VASc, C2HEST, and FIND-AF models was evaluated on Prediction performance for AF hospitalisation (AUC 0.792, 95% CI 0.777-0.807). The derived FIND-AF Taiwan machine learning model demonstrated superior prediction performance for incident AF hospitalisation (AUC 0.792; 95% CI 0.777-0.807) compared to existing clinical scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: