Key result
FIND-AF Taiwan ML model predicts incident AF with an AUROC of ~0.79.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation confers increased risk of cardiovascular conditions, and while prediction algorithms have attempted to predict incident AF, other cardio-renal diseases could also provide targets for earlier intervention.
Does higher predicted risk of atrial fibrillation using the FIND-AF Taiwan algorithm predict incident AF and subsequent cardio-renal outcomes in a Western Pacific population?
Cohort (n=103,321)
No
Does higher predicted risk of atrial fibrillation using the FIND-AF Taiwan algorithm predict incident AF and subsequent cardio-renal outcomes in a Western Pacific population?
Effect estimate: AUROC 0.792 (95% CI 0.777-0.807)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 2.2%
A machine learning algorithm using routine electronic health records can accurately predict incident atrial fibrillation and identify patients at high risk for subsequent cardio-renal events.
May support EHR-based AF risk stratification in Asian cohorts; extends prior scores yet leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background and Aim Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects over 37 million people internationally and confers increased risk of cardiovascular conditions. Prediction algorithms have attempted to predict incident AF, but other cardio–renal diseases could also provide targets for earlier intervention. Method We derived a random forest classified for incident AF within 5 years (Future Innovations in Novel Detection of Atrial Fibrillation [FIND-AF] Taiwan) using routinely collected data from the National Taiwan University Hospital database. We compared this to congestive heart failure, hypertension, age >75 years (two points), diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischaemic attack/thromboembolism (two points), vascular disease, age 65–74 years, sex category (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) and coronary artery disease/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (one point each), hypertension, elderly (age ≥75 years, two points), systolic heart failure, thyroid disease (hyperthyroidism) (C 2 HEST). Youden's Index was calculated to determine optimal threshold for higher versus lower predicted AF risk. We calculated cumulative incident curves and hazard ratios for incident AF, heart failure hospitalisation, or development of moderate-to-severe renal impairment, stroke or transient ischaemic attack and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Results Overall, 103,321 patients were included, with an average age of 64.6 years and 52.8% women. Overall, 4.4% had incident AF over the 5-year follow-up period. FIND-AF Taiwan had better discrimination (area under received operating characteristic 0.792, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.777–0.807) than CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (0.737; 0.721–0.754) and C 2 HEST (0.750; 0.733–0.766). After adjustment, individuals at higher risk were at increased hazard for heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 15.32; 95% CI 9.19–25.54), transient ischaemic attack or ischaemic stroke (28.4; 21.01–38.47), progression to moderate or severe chronic kidney disease (1.18; 1.09–1.27), cardiovascular mortality (1.32; 0.88–1.98), and all-cause mortality (1.23; 1.11–1.36). Conclusions We derived a supervised machine learning algorithm for AF in a Western Pacific population and demonstrated that higher risk was associated with hospitalisation for other cardio–renal diseases and death. This tool could be used to target interventions to reduce hospitalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation risk (n=103,321). Higher predicted AF risk by FIND-AF Taiwan algorithm vs. Lower predicted AF risk by FIND-AF Taiwan algorithm was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation within 5 years (AUROC 0.792, 95% CI 0.777-0.807). The FIND-AF Taiwan machine learning algorithm predicted incident atrial fibrillation with an AUROC of 0.792, and higher predicted risk was associated with increased hazard for cardio-renal events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: