Impella support before continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may injure the aortic valve, potentially accelerating aortic regurgitation (AR) progression, resulting in poor outcomes. A single-center retrospective analysis of 384 patients implanted with durable LVADs between 2011 and 2025 was performed. Patients were separated into prior Impella support (group 1, n = 87) and those without (group 2, n = 297). Outcomes included aortic valve intervention at LVAD implantation, AR prevalence at baseline, within 30 days, and 6 months, and mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Aortic valve intervention occurred in 10.3% of group 1 vs . 5.0% of group 2 ( p = 0.071). Group 1 had higher baseline AR (24% vs . 15%, p = 0.041) and more moderate or worse AR at 30 days (3.4% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.041) and 6 months (6.8% vs . 0.6%, p = 0.014). Impella duration did not correlate with aortic valve intervention (median 8 vs . 6 days, p = 0.198). Mortality at 30 days (2% vs . 4%, p = 0.958) and 1 year (7% vs . 13%, p = 0.116) was similar. Impella use before durable LVAD was associated with increased AR progression at 30 days and 6 months. This suggests those with preoperative Impella should have the aortic valve assessed at the time of removal and consider intervention if significant.
Niehaus et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: