PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026New Phytologist2 citations

Trait – climate relationships in 454 eucalypt taxa : common garden vs field ‐ derived trends

View Full Paper
TBTravis G. BrittonBHBen HalliwellCBChris J. Blackman

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how site climate affects trait variation in eucalypt trees and the roles of adaptation versus plasticity.
  • Tested hypotheses for trait-climate relationships in mature eucalypt trees
  • Quantified effects of mean annual precipitation and temperature on eight functional traits
  • Compared trait-climate relationships from common garden and field conditions
  • Strong relationships between traits and mean annual precipitation, except one trait
  • Weaker relationships observed with mean annual temperature
  • Plasticity plays a larger role in photosynthetic traits compared to structural traits
  • Highlighted contributions of both adaptation and plasticity in trait patterns

Abstract

Summary Understanding the role of site climate in driving geographic trait variation and revealing the relative contributions of adaptation and plasticity are key goals in plant sciences. We tested mechanistic hypotheses for trait–climate relationships for mature eucalypt trees grown in common garden and in situ field conditions, quantifying joint and individual effects of mean annual precipitation (MAP) and temperature (MAT) on eight functionally important traits. Trait–MAP relationships were particularly strong, with all but one trait consistently related to precipitation in both growth conditions. Trait–MAT relationships were notably weaker, but where relationships existed, most traits responded to low temperature in the same direction as to low rainfall, as predicted. Comparing cross‐species trait–climate relationships in situ with trait–climate‐of‐origin relationships in the common garden indicated substantial contributions from both adaptation and plasticity, with plasticity contributing more to variation in photosynthetic traits than in leaf structural or wood traits. Two key advances were: teasing apart the roles of site temperature and rainfall on trait variation, which are often confounded; and inferring the contributions of adaptation and plasticity to observed trait patterns. The relative importance of these processes may determine the timescales over which plant traits shift with climate change.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Britton et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828100fc35cd7a8847409https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70930
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies1999 · 957 citations
  2. 2A dated molecular perspective of eucalypt taxonomy, evolution and diversification2019 · 130 citations
  3. 3Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas2017 · 4,264 citations
  4. 4WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas2017 · 17,478 citations
  5. 5Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure2001 · 1,599 citations