Key result
Concentric calcification is linked to ~37% more IVL calcium fractures than eccentric calcification.
Why the study?
Does the efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) on stent expansion differ between concentric and eccentric calcified coronary lesions?
Observational (n=80)
Does the efficacy of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) on stent expansion differ between concentric and eccentric calcified coronary lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 23.3%
p-value: p=0.03
IVL produces more calcium fractures in concentric compared to eccentric calcifications, and a maximum calcium thickness over 1,225μm predicts stent under-expansion in concentric lesions.
Background Coronary calcification is one of predictor for suboptimal stent expansion. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a useful device that modifies calcified lesions. Purpose We investigated that efficacy of IVL to concentric and eccentric calcifications by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The aim of this study was whether relationship between calcium fractures after IVL and stent expansion by OCT assessment. Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent OCT-guided IVL and coronary stenting were included. Cross-sectional OCT images at 1-mm intervals in pre-IVL (2,398), post-IVL (2,380), and post-stenting (2,728) time points were analyzed. All lesions were divided into 2 groups with median calcium arc 180゚in each segments. Concentric group had 53 lesions with over 180゚ calcifications, eccentric calcium group had 27 lesions with less than 180゚ calcifications. Baseline maximum calcium thickness was similar between 2 groups. Final stent expansion index (SEI) was also similar between 2 groups. Results Calcium fractures after IVL were more frequent in concentric group compared with eccentric group (32.0% vs. 23.3%, p=0.03). Stent under-expansion (SEI < 0.85) was associated with maximum calcium thickness in concentric group (p=0.03), but not in eccentric group (p=0.56). In concentric group, receiver operation characteristic curve analysis identified maximum calcium thickness 1,225μm as the best cutoff to predict SEI < 0.85. Percentage of fractured segment after IVL was positively correlated with SEI (r=0.337, p=0.01). Fracture width after IVL was also correlated with SEI (r=0.377, p< 0.01). Conclusions Calcium fractures after IVL were more frequent in concentric calcification compared with eccentric calcification. Percentage of fractures and large fracture width after IVL are associated with higher stent SEI. Our study suggests that calcium thickness over 1,225μm is predicted for stent under-expansion in concentric calcified lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shishido et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary calcification (n=80). Concentric calcification vs. Eccentric calcification was evaluated on Calcium fractures after intravascular lithotripsy (p=0.03). Following intravascular lithotripsy, calcium fractures were more frequent in concentric calcifications compared to eccentric calcifications (32.0% vs. 23.3%, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: