Key result
Severe MR during exercise stress echo linked to ~120% higher mortality independent of CAD and RWMA.
Why the study?
The role and prognostic value of mitral regurgitation assessment during exercise stress echocardiography beyond inducible regional wall motion abnormalities in patients undergoing evaluation for any clinical indication remained uncertain.
Does the presence of severe mitral regurgitation during exercise stress echocardiography predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing ESE for any indication?
Does the presence of severe mitral regurgitation during exercise stress echocardiography predict all-cause mortality in patients undergoing ESE for any indication?
Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity during routine exercise stress echocardiography provides independent prognostic value for all-cause mortality beyond regional wall motion abnormalities.
Exercise severe MR was associated with higher mortality on ESE; leaves open whether routine assessment refines risk stratification or warrants trials.
Background Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is recommended in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) when resting echocardiographic findings and symptoms do not align. However, the role of MR assessment in patients undergoing ESE for any indication remains uncertain. Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether the assessment of MR during ESE provides prognostic value beyond the evaluation of inducible regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) in patients undergoing ESE for any clinical indication, including suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Data were analyzed from a large multicenter and multinational prospective study. Current analysis included patients who underwent ESE for any indication and had MR (from 0= absent, to 3= severe) assessed at rest and peak exercise with an integrated qualitative, semi-quantitative, and (in selected cases) quantitative assessment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Of 1,351 included patients (age 56±16 years; 66% women; 30% with known CAD). MR score increased during exercise (rest=0.74±0.7 vs. peak=0.89±0.8, p<0.001), with severe MR present in 2% of patients at rest and 7% at peak ESE. Patients with severe MR during exercise (n=96, Group 1) compared to those with non-severe MR during exercise (n=1255, Group 2) showed more B-lines, lower left ventricular contractile and chronotropic reserve, and trend (p=0.09) to more frequent decrease in ejection fraction during ESE (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 1.0–6.9), 99 patients (7%) had died. Severe MR at rest was associated with increased mortality (log-rank p<0.001). Patients with severe MR at peak ESE had a higher risk of death compared to the other patients (log-rank p 0.035) (Figure 1). After adjusting for age, CAD, and inducible RWMA, severe MR with exercise remained strongly associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted-HR: 2.2, 95%CI 1.3-3.8, p=0.002). Similar results were seen with further adjustment for rest MR severity (adjusted-HR:1.9, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.004). Conclusion Patients, with and without CAD, with severe MR during ESE have greater functional impairment expressed by more pulmonary congestion, blunted heart rate reserve, and lower left ventricular contractile reserve. The assessment of MR during ESE provides significant prognostic information, independent of resting RWMA or inducible ischemia. Incorporating MR evaluation into routine ESE protocols may improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bursi et al. (2025) studied this question. Severe mitral regurgitation during exercise stress echocardiography doubled risk of all-cause mortality (HR 2.2, 95%CI 1.3-3.8, p=0.002) independent of CAD and RWMA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: