Key result
Advanced mitral regurgitation was independently associated with reduced effort tolerance (B=-1.36; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.93; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Mitral regurgitation has the potential to impede exercise capacity, but whether this is due to regurgitation itself or the underlying cause remained uncertain.
Does the presence and severity of mitral regurgitation reduce effort tolerance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=3,267)
Does the presence and severity of mitral regurgitation reduce effort tolerance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Mitral regurgitation severity independently impairs exercise tolerance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, regardless of left ventricular ischemia or dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MR may limit exercise tolerance beyond LV ischemia or dysfunction; leaves open whether MR-specific interventions improve capacity in prospective trials.
Background Mitral regurgitation ( MR ) has the potential to impede exercise capacity; it is uncertain whether this is because of regurgitation itself or the underlying cause of valvular insufficiency. Methods and Results The population comprised 3267 patients who underwent exercise treadmill myocardial perfusion imaging and transthoracic echocardiography within 6±8 days. MR was present in 28%, including 176 patients (5%) with moderate or greater MR . Left ventricular systolic function significantly decreased and chamber size increased in relation to MR , paralleling increments in stress and rest myocardial perfusion deficits (all P<0.001). Exercise tolerance (metabolic equivalents of task) decreased stepwise in relation to graded MR severity ( P<0.05). Workload was significantly lower with mild versus no MR (mean±SD, 9.8±3.0 versus 10.1±3.0; P=0.02); magnitude of workload reduction significantly increased among patients with advanced versus those with mild MR (mean±SD, 8.6±3.0 versus 9.8±3.0; P<0.001). MR -associated exercise impairment was accompanied by lower heart rate and blood pressure augmentation and greater dyspnea (all P<0.05). Both functional and nonfunctional MR subgroups demonstrated significantly decreased effort tolerance in relation to MR severity ( P≤0.01); impairment was greater with functional MR ( P=0.04) corresponding to more advanced left ventricular dysfunction and dilation (both P<0.001). Functional MR predicted reduced metabolic equivalent of task-based effort (B=-0.39 [95% CI, -0.62 to -0.17]; P=0.001) independent of MR severity. Among the overall cohort, advanced (moderate or greater) MR was associated with reduced effort tolerance (B=-1.36 [95% CI, -1.80 to -0.93]; P<0.001) and remained significant ( P=0.01) after controlling for age, clinical indexes, stress perfusion defects, and left ventricular dysfunction. Conclusions MR impairs exercise tolerance independent of left ventricular ischemia, dysfunction, and clinical indexes. Magnitude of exercise impairment parallels severity of MR .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kampaktsis et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Known or suspected coronary artery disease (n=3,267). Mitral regurgitation vs. No mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Exercise tolerance (metabolic equivalents of task) (B -1.36, 95% CI -1.80 to -0.93, p=<0.001). Advanced mitral regurgitation was independently associated with reduced effort tolerance (B=-1.36; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.93; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: