Key result
Top-quartile CRP in acute MI is linked to ~140% greater new-onset HF risk.
Why the study?
Although CRP predicts mortality after acute MI, whether it is associated with new-onset heart failure was unknown.
Does higher C-reactive protein at hospitalization predict new-onset heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does higher C-reactive protein at hospitalization predict new-onset heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
In patients with acute MI without prior heart failure, higher CRP concentrations at hospitalization are independently associated with a graded, increased risk of new-onset heart failure up to 1 year.
May aid post-MI HF risk stratification; leaves open whether CRP-targeted interventions reduce incidence.
Background C-reactive protein (CRP), a circulating biomarker of inflammation, is associated with myocardial infarct size in animal models. We have previously shown that CRP at hospitalization is a predictor of both short- and long-term death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, whether CRP is associated with new-onset heart failure (HF) in such individuals is unknown. Purpose To assess the association between CRP and risk of incident HF in persons with acute MI, without a prior history of HF. Methods We used the Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with a first MI diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnostic code: I21) from 2012 through 2020. Those who underwent CRP and high-sensitivity troponin measurements within 24 hours of this index hospitalization were included, while subjects with acute infection were excluded. For this analysis, individuals with a history of heart failure were also excluded. Patients were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on their first CRP measurement. Absolute and relative risks for hospitalization or outpatient contact for heart failure at days 0-30 and 31-365 were calculated through multivariable Cox regression with average treatment effect modeling. Models were standardized for demographic and clinical features, including prior cardiovascular or inflammatory disease, hemoglobin concentration, and high-sensitivity troponin concentration. Results A total of 31,528 individuals were included of whom 2,813 were excluded due to a history of heart failure. Thus, this analysis was based on the remaining 28,715 persons. Median age was 68.1 (interquartile range: 57.6 to 77.2) years, and 33.6% were women. Median CRP in the entire cohort was 4.9 (interquartile range: 2.8 to 13) mg/l, and quartile intervals were: Q1: <2.9 mg/l, Q2: 2.9 to <4 mg/l, Q3: 4 to <14 mg/l, and Q4: ≥14 mg/l. CRP was significantly and nonlinearly associated with the primary outcome (p<0.001). At 0-30 days, 2,317 patients had been diagnosed with heart failure, and another 1,595 had developed heart failure between days 31-365. The standardized absolute risk of heart failure at both 0-30 and 31-365 days was lowest among patients in Q1 (0-30 days: 5.6%; 31-365 days: 4.2%) and highest among patients in Q4 (0-30 days: 12.9%; 31-365 days: 10.4%). The standardized relative risks of heart failure as compared with Q1 were: Q2: 1.08 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.23), Q3: 1.55 (1.37 to 1.74), and Q4: 2.30 (2.03 to 2.57) at 30 days, and Q2: 1.13 (0.95 to 1.31), Q3: 1.40 (1.19 to 1.60), and Q4: 2.46 (2.11 to 2.81) at 365 days. Conclusion In patients with acute MI who did not have a history of HF, we found a graded, positive association between CRP concentration and the risk of new-onset heart failure, independently of high-sensitivity troponin concentration. This finding highlights inflammation as a potential target for both risk stratification and secondary prevention of HF after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byrne et al. (2025) studied this question. Higher CRP quartiles in acute MI patients without prior HF were associated with increased 30-day and 1-year new-onset HF risk; Q4 had 2.30-2.46 times higher risk vs Q1.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: