Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis presents significant accessibility benefits from land-use changes in Norway, suggesting broader integration is needed.
Integrated land-use and transport strategies require a cross-sectoral governance approach and institutional collaboration. However, current planning practices and evaluation models in the Nordics often fail to capture how land-use strategies influence transport demand and accessibility. This article presents a comparative analysis of accessibility benefits from four land-use scenarios and two road investments in Kristiansand, Norway. Our results show that modest land-use changes may provide substantial changes in accessibility benefits compared to transport investments. These findings highlight the need to more fully integrate spatial planning into land-use and transport appraisal frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stigen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: