What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to argue against the normalization of solar geoengineering as a viable climate policy option.

January 17, 2022Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate ChangeOpen Access

Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non‐use agreement

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The aim is to argue against the normalization of solar geoengineering as a viable climate policy option.
Analyze the implications of solar geoengineering technologies.
Discuss the governance challenges within the current international political system.
Propose the core elements of an International Non-Use Agreement.
Solar geoengineering is deemed ungovernable under current international frameworks.
The need for an immediate political response to regulate solar geoengineering is emphasized.
Proposal outlines specific elements to create a comprehensive non-use agreement.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This article calls for an international agreement to prevent the use of solar geoengineering technologies, suggesting implications for climate policy.

Cite This Study

Biermann et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698b54875eae140f9fe9b18b https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.754

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This article calls for an international agreement to prevent the use of solar geoengineering technologies, suggesting implications for climate policy.

Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non‐use agreement

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Solar geoengineering: The case for an international non‐use agreement

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider