This empirical evaluation finds that manifold geometry better explains consciousness in various states, suggesting new understandings of awareness.
This paper evaluates whether conscious level is better captured by dynamical traversability than by neural entropy, explicitly framed against Churchland’s criteria for a mature neurocomputational theory. Using EEG and fMRI across anesthesia, sleep, epilepsy, and task engagement, we show that manifold geometry and second-order dynamics dissociate conscious level from entropy-like measures. Meta-Noetic Phase Space and Jacobian-based indices track loss and recovery of consciousness where entropy fails, supporting a dynamical–geometric account aligned with biological and computational constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin Langell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: