The study proposes an optimal operation strategy to enhance energy efficiency in regional CCHP systems, highlighting significant cost reductions.
With the increasing integration of regional energy systems, the dynamic coupling characteristics of cooling, heating, and power flows have become significantly pronounced. However, traditional scheduling models often utilize steady-state assumptions that neglect the thermal transmission delay of the pipeline network, leading to spatiotemporal mismatches between energy supply and load demand. To address this issue, this paper proposes an optimal operation strategy for regional Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power (CCHP) systems that explicitly integrates thermal inertia. First, a Pipeline Fluid Micro-element Discretization Method (PFMDM) is developed based on the Lagrangian specification to accurately characterize the dynamic flow and thermal decay processes without the heavy computational burden of partial differential equations. In addition, the accuracy of PFMDM is directly benchmarked against a high-fidelity transient PDE solver (finite-volume TVD–MUSCL scheme) over a wide range of pipe lengths, flow velocities, and thermal loss coefficients, where the outlet-temperature RMSE remains below 0.2 °C. This model quantitatively reveals the “Virtual Energy Storage” (VES) mechanism of the pipeline network. Second, to overcome the “curse of dimensionality” in dynamic scheduling, a Load-Gradient-Based Adaptive Temporal Discretization (LG-ATD) method is proposed. This method maintains a fine-grained baseline for electrical settlement while dynamically aggregating thermal/cooling steps based on load fluctuations. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed strategy corrects the significant physical deviations of the traditional steady-state model. The analysis reveals that the steady-state model underestimates the required heating and cooling supply capacities by up to 26.66% and 39.15%, respectively, due to the neglect of transmission losses and delays. By leveraging the VES mechanism, the proposed method enables a fuel-shift in the energy-supply structure, substantially decreasing the electricity purchasing cost (by 75.2% in the tested case). This reduction reflects a reallocation from grid purchases to on-site gas-fired cogeneration to maintain physical feasibility under delay and loss effects, and therefore, it is accompanied by an increase in natural gas consumption and a higher total operating cost. Furthermore, the LG-ATD method significantly alleviates the computational burden by substantially compressing the presolved model size and reducing the overall solving time by more than 80%, thereby effectively mitigating the curse of dimensionality for practical engineering applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: