Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced flexibility and cost-effectiveness in integrated energy systems, suggesting improved reliability of renewable energy.
Background: Wind power integration challenges and the limited flexibility of combined heat and power (CHP) systems hinder the efficient operation of integrated energy systems. Objective: To enhance system adaptability to wind power uncertainties and achieve economical operation by addressing the above issues. Method: An integrated energy system coordination model centered on CHP units with electric heat storage boilers and thermal storage tanks is established. A multi-time-scale robust optimization strategy is proposed: day-ahead scheduling uses a hybrid reinforcement learning–genetic algorithm approach, with deep Q networks for discrete operation decisions and genetic algorithms for continuous power allocation; intra-day scheduling adopts a 4-hour prediction horizon and a 15- minute time step; real-time scheduling uses a 1-hour dispatch cycle and a 5-minute interval. Results: The model expands the feasible domain of electricity–heat decoupling, avoids local optimization associated with single algorithms, reduces total operating costs by approximately 10%, and significantly improves the renewable energy accommodation rate and system flexibility. Discussion: The proposed multi-time-scale scheduling strategy with electric heat storage effectively balances wind power volatility and CHP operational rigidity, reducing costs and enhancing flexibility through a hybrid algorithm. However, it does not consider multi-energy network constraints and lacks large-scale validation. Conclusion: The proposed approach achieves dynamic complementarity between electricity and heat resources, providing a feasible solution for the economical and efficient operation of integrated energy systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhaoxing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: