Key result
Higher baseline QTcF linked to ~5% greater odds of QTcF ≥500ms during resistant tuberculosis treatment.
Why the study?
Treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis involves drugs that can prolong the QT interval, but data on risk factors and the level of cardiac monitoring required are limited.
What are the risk factors for QT prolongation ≥500ms and the accuracy of a monitoring strategy in patients treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis?
Cohort (n=556)
Yes
What are the risk factors for QT prolongation ≥500ms and the accuracy of a monitoring strategy in patients treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis?
Effect estimate: OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.07)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.8% vs 6.9%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Baseline QTcF and geographical region are associated with increased odds of QT prolongation in RR-TB patients, and a monitoring strategy can effectively identify high-risk individuals.
Higher baseline QTcF may support risk-stratified QT monitoring in RR-TB; leaves open prospective validation of thresholds.
Treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) involves drugs that can prolong the QT interval. There is limited data on risk factors and the level of cardiac monitoring required. We analysed STREAM Stage 2 data to address these issues. A post-hoc analysis was undertaken of data from participants allocated to 3 regimens: 9-month control (n = 202), 9-month oral (n = 211) and 6-month (n = 143). Risk factors for development of a QT or QTcF (corrected QT interval [Fredericia’s formula]) interval ≥500ms were assessed. The diagnostic accuracy of a monitoring strategy for QT/QTcF prolongation was tested. QT/QTcF ≥ 500ms occurred on all regimens: 9-month control (n = 14 (6.9%)), 9-month oral (n = 8 (3.8%)) and 6-month (n = 6 (4.2%)). The participating country with the highest number of QT/QTcF interval ≥500ms events was Mongolia (18 events [64%]). A higher baseline QTcF was significantly associated with development of QT/QTcF ≥ 500ms (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.07, p < 0.001). There was a suggested association between moxifloxacin (compared to levofloxacin, OR 2.49; 95% CI 0.92 to 6.71, p = 0.07) and a higher baseline TSH (OR 3.52; 95% CI 0.84 to 14.73, p = 0.08) and increased odds of QT/QTcF ≥ 500ms. The monitoring strategy performed well in the control (sensitivity 100%; specificity 62%; positive predictive value (PPV) 13% and negative predictive value (NPV) 100%) and oral (sensitivity 100%, specificity 59%, PPV 6% and NPV 100%) regimen groups. Baseline QTcF and geographical region were associated with increased odds of QT/QTcF prolongation. The monitoring strategy performed well in the identification of participants at higher risk of QT/QTcF prolongation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) (n=556). 9-month oral and 6-month regimens vs. 9-month control regimen was evaluated on QT or QTcF interval ≥500ms (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.07, p=< 0.001). Higher baseline QTcF was significantly associated with the development of a QT/QTcF interval ≥500ms in patients treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.07; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: