Key result
Lowering home BP threshold to 130/80 mmHg improves diagnostic accuracy to ~88%, reducing masked hypertension.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether lowering the home blood pressure threshold for hypertension diagnosis from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg enhances diagnostic accuracy against ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Does lowering the home blood pressure diagnostic threshold to 130/80 mmHg improve diagnostic accuracy for hypertension compared to 135/85 mmHg in untreated participants?
Does lowering the home blood pressure diagnostic threshold to 130/80 mmHg improve diagnostic accuracy for hypertension compared to 135/85 mmHg in untreated participants?
Lowering the home blood pressure diagnostic threshold to 130/80 mmHg improves diagnostic precision and reduces the misclassification of masked and sustained hypertension compared to the conventional 135/85 mmHg threshold.
May reduce masked hypertension misclassification in untreated adults; leaves open whether 130/80 mmHg threshold improves outcomes.
Objectives: This study investigated whether lowering the home blood pressure (BP) threshold for the diagnosis of hypertension from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg enhances diagnostic accuracy when assessed against ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Methods: A total of 646 untreated participants (mean age 52 ± 10 years; 310 men) with valid 3-day office BP, 7-day home BP, and 24-h ABPM data and preserved renal function were included. Hypertension phenotypes were classified as normotension, white-coat, masked, and sustained hypertension according to office BP and ABPM criteria. Results: Lowering the home BP threshold increased sensitivity from 72.3 to 89.5% but reduced specificity from 81.8 to 69.1%, thereby improving overall diagnostic accuracy from 73.1 to 87.8% and the kappa coefficient from 0.238 to 0.247. At the conventional threshold of 135/85 mmHg, 63.2% of masked and 15.1% of sustained hypertension were misclassified as normotension, whereas these rates declined to 30.3 and 3.4%, respectively, at the 130/80 mmHg threshold. Individuals with home BP between 130/80 and 134/84 mmHg showed intermediate office and ambulatory BP values, with a high prevalence of masked (32.9%) and sustained hypertension (11.7%). Within this subgroup, isolated nighttime and daytime–nighttime hypertension were identified in 35.7 and 13.5% of participants, respectively. Conclusion: The conventional home BP threshold of 135/85 mmHg may fail to identify a considerable proportion of masked, sustained, and nighttime hypertension. Lowering the threshold to 130/80 mmHg, or designating 130/80–134/84 mmHg as a diagnostic ‘gray zone’ warranting ABPM confirmation, may improve diagnostic precision and facilitate earlier detection of hypertension in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2026) studied this question. Lowering home BP threshold from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg increased sensitivity to 89.5%, improved overall diagnostic accuracy to 87.8%, reducing masked hypertension misclassification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: