Key result
Standardized biomarker development pathways are essential to translate findings into clinical practice and improve outcomes.
Why the study?
Many biomarkers for ejection fraction, heart failure, or myocardial infarction fail to translate into clinical practice because they lack essential performance characteristics or regulatory approval, with new technologies adding to the complexities of translation.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Proceedings / state-of-the-art review
May guide cardiovascular biomarker research; leaves open real-world translation without prospective validation.
Many biomarkers that could be used to assess ejection fraction, heart failure, or myocardial infarction fail to translate into clinical practice because they lack essential performance characteristics or fail to meet regulatory standards for approval. Despite their potential, new technologies have added to the complexities of successful translation into clinical practice. Biomarker discovery and implementation require a standardized approach that includes: identification of a clinical need; identification of a valid surrogate biomarker; stepwise assay refinement, demonstration of superiority over current standard-of-care; development and understanding of a clinical pathway; and demonstration of real-world performance. Successful biomarkers should improve efficacy or safety of treatment, while being practical at a realistic cost. Everyone involved in cardiovascular healthcare, including researchers, clinicians, and industry partners, are important stakeholders in facilitating the development and implementation of biomarkers. This article provides suggestions for a development pathway for new biomarkers, discusses regulatory issues and challenges, and suggestions for accelerating the pathway to improve patient outcomes. Real-life examples of successful biomarkers—high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, and echocardiography—are used to illustrate the value of a standardized development pathway in the translation of concepts into routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elliott et al. (2020) studied this question. A standardized development pathway for biomarkers is essential for translating findings into clinical practice to improve treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: