Analytical framework examines low-carbon policy impacts in a duopoly, indicating essential strategies for sustainability.
This study examines the optimal design of low-carbon policies for governments, firms, and consumers within a unified analytical framework. We develop a three-stage game-theoretic duopoly model with differentiated products, green R&D, and knowledge spillovers to analyze the effects and implications of low-carbon policies in a polluting industry. The analysis encompasses both Cournot and Bertrand competition under commitment and non-commitment regimes, as well as non-cooperative and cooperative R&D structures. Specifically, we (i) quantify the impacts of low-carbon policies on R&D, emissions, profits, and welfare across alternative competition modes, policy-timing regimes, and R&D organizations; (ii) examine the roles of key policy parameters across all scenarios; and (iii) provide an integrated and intuitive interpretation of the underlying economic mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: