Research investigates durability of ceramic adhesives under environmental stress, highlighting implications for adhesive selection.
Current international standards (EN 12004; SI 4004) are testing ceramic tile adhesives under post-cure thermal aging. However, the standards omit UV radiation exposure during the fresh-adhesive phase. This research investigated three commercial polymer-modified cement adhesives (C2TE, C2TE-S2, C2T) bonding porcelain stoneware tiles under simulated Eastern Mediterranean and desert conditions. Three commercial adhesives were exposed during the initial (uncured) period to elevated temperature (30 °C), humidity variation (40–65% RH), and UV radiation (295–365 nm, 1.5–2.0 mW/cm2) for 20 min, followed by 28 days of curing. Pull-off testing and scanning electron microscopy, combined with quantitative directionality analysis, were used to characterize the mechanical performance and microstructural degradation. UV exposure of adhesives during tiling working time caused a drop of mean bond strength from 1.77 to 0.26 MPa (85% reduction) compared with 1.77 to 0.64 MPa (36% reduction) under hot-arid conditions. Microstructural analysis of the hardened pull-off adhesives revealed that exposure of the fresh adhesive to UV radiation causes thinning and degradation of the interfacial layer (15–40 µm), leading to a drop in macroscopic strength. In contrast, hot-arid exposure induces adhesive bulk cracking while preserving interface integrity. Fracture surface directionality (goodness parameter), crack density, and delamination percentage together distinguish interface failure from adhesive bulk degradation and provide a forecast of long-term durability. This combined SEM-mechanical approach identified critical gaps in testing protocols and enables evidence-based adhesive selection, as current EN 12004 classifications based solely on mechanical properties prove insufficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rina Wasserman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: