Abstract Accepting some form of potentialist set theory promises to help us solve puzzles about the intended height of the hierarchy of sets.
Accepting some form of potentialist set theory promises to help us solve puzzles about the intended height of the hierarchy of sets. However, philosophers have developed two different schools of potentialist set theory: minimalist and dependence-based approaches. In this paper, I will argue that minimalist formulations of potentialism have some important advantages over dependence-based formulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharon Berry (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: