PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026ACM Transactions on Evolutionary Learning and Optimization0 citations

Anytime Benchmarking of Forty-Five PAES-25 Configurations on Multi- and Many-Objective Variants of Leading-Ones-Trailing-Zeros Functions

View Full Paper
JKJoshua KnowlesALArnaud Liefooghe

Key Points

  • Investigate the performance of the PAES-25 algorithm using various configurations of the LOTZ benchmark.
  • Used variants of the Leading Ones Trailing Zeros (LOTZ) benchmark.
  • Implemented a local search algorithm (PAES-25) with multiple configuration options.
  • Measured anytime performance through online metrics.
  • Observed significant differences in performance based on the configurations of PAES-25.
  • Provided insights into how algorithm dynamics change with different time constraints.
  • Contributed to understanding many-objective optimization through detailed analysis.

Abstract

The Leading Ones Trailing Zeros (LOTZ) benchmark is a well-established bi-objective pseudo-Boolean function (of scalable size) that has both a linear-sized Pareto front, and also a front that is “far away” from a random solution. As such it is a useful function for understanding the behaviour of multi-objective optimization algorithms, especially regarding their ability to approach the front and expand and maintain solutions all along it. It has contributed to both algorithm design and theoretical analysis. In this paper, we make use of three variants of LOTZ, recently introduced , which generalized it to the many-objective case in different ways while aiming to maintain similar properties of the original. We add further detail to the mathematical description of the benchmarks and use them to analyse the performance of a simple multi-objective local search algorithm (PAES-25) (based on (1+1)-PAES) with plug-in modules for archiving, neighbourhood, selection method (from the archive or not), and acceptance function. We measure the anytime performance of PAES-25 in different variants by observing a suite of online measures that give an insight into the dynamics of the algorithm and provide guidance as to choice of configuration depending on factors such as time available and size of Pareto approximation set desired . We believe that the benchmarks and the anytime, multidimensional methods used for analysis might motivate further theory (especially of many-objective optimization and archiving) and may also contribute usefully to algorithm design ideas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Knowles et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b3b19b75e639e9b0872ahttps://doi.org/10.1145/3787220
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper