PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2026Foods2 citationsOpen Access

Influence of Extraction Methods on Polyphenol Profile and Antiradical Activity of Hops

View Full Paper
AMAlexandr MIKYŠKAMDMartin DušekTVTomáš Vrzal

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare different extraction methods and their influence on the polyphenol profile and antioxidant potential of hops.
  • Compared hot-water extraction and 80% aqueous acetone extraction for polyphenol recovery.
  • Examined four Czech hop cultivars from two different harvest years.
  • Evaluated polyphenol content, including total, anthocyanogens, and flavonoids, using UHPLC–HRMS.
  • Assessed antiradical activity using the DPPH assay.
  • Conducted correlation analyses between antiradical activity and polyphenol levels.
  • Aqueous acetone extraction yielded higher amounts of anthocyanogens and prenylflavonoids.
  • Hot-water extraction produced higher total polyphenol content but lower anthocyanogens and antioxidant capacity.
  • Antiradical activity in water extracts was strongly correlated with polyphenol levels, while in acetone extracts, it was influenced by bitter acids.

Abstract

Hop polyphenols contribute to beer stability and possess a wide range of biological activities; however, information on how extraction conditions influence their recovery and antioxidant potential remains limited. This study aimed to compare hot-water extraction, simulating wort boiling, with 80% aqueous acetone extraction as initial sample preparation steps for assessing the polyphenol content and antiradical activity of hops. Sample sets of four Czech hop cultivars from two contrasting harvest years were examined. Group-type polyphenols, total polyphenols, anthocyanogens, flavanoids and UHPLC–HRMS flavonoid profiles were evaluated. Antiradical activity was evaluated by the DPPH assay. Extraction solvent markedly affected both the composition and antiradical properties of hop extracts. Aqueous acetone provided substantially higher yields of anthocyanogens and prenylflavonoids and consistently higher antiradical activity, particularly in cultivars with elevated α-acid content. In contrast, hot-water extracts yielded slightly higher total polyphenols but significantly lower anthocyanogens and reduced antioxidant capacity. Correlation analyses showed that antiradical activity in water extracts was strongly driven by polyphenol levels, whereas in acetone extracts it was influenced by additional constituents, including bitter acids. Extraction solvent critically determines the polyphenolic profile and antioxidant behavior of hop extracts. Aqueous acetone proved more effective for isolating bioactive polyphenol fractions relevant to antiradical performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

MIKYŠKA et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6992b45f9b75e639e9b094c6https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040702
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper