Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental validation demonstrates improved accuracy and reduced jerk in robotic arm applications, suggesting greater efficiency in industry.
Purpose In high-precision industrial robotics, sudden changes in acceleration (jerk) often induce vibrations, increase mechanical wear and compromise accuracy. To address these issues, this study aims to introduce a jerk-minimized trajectory planning framework for a 4-degree-of-freedom (DOF) robotic arm, integrating root multiplicity directly into the inverse kinematics formulation. Design/methodology/approach A hybrid simulation–experimental framework was developed in this study. MATLAB was used to compute joint parameters using segmented polynomial profiles, where root multiplicity was enforced to ensure zero-acceleration boundary conditions and suppress jerk. The optimized joint trajectories were executed on an Arduino-controlled 4-DOF robotic arm to perform a three-dimensional pick-and-place task under low-load execution conditions, with experimental validation presented as a controlled proof-of-concept demonstration. Comparative evaluations were conducted against conventional trapezoidal point-to-point (PTP) and quintic polynomial trajectory planning methods. Findings The proposed method achieved a reduction of up to 87% in the peak jerk and a 64% improvement in the end-effector path accuracy compared with conventional trapezoidal PTP trajectories, with additional enhancements observed over quintic polynomial methods. Originality/value Unlike conventional spline- or quintic-based approaches, the proposed framework leverages root multiplicity for a computationally efficient and analytically tractable solution that directly integrates with inverse kinematics. Its successful implementation on low-cost hardware demonstrates strong potential for scalable, real-time deployment in Industry 5.0 applications such as assembly, inspection, and human–robot collaboration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thimothy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: