Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis examines changes in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease incidence ratios through epidemiologic stages, indicating significant shifts over time.
Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) progresses through distinct epidemiologic stages: Stage 1 (Emergence), low incidence/prevalence; stage 2 (Acceleration in Incidence), rapid increasing incidence; stage 3 (Compounding Prevalence), stabilizing incidence and increasing prevalence. As IBD emerges in a population, ulcerative colitis (UC) incidence typically exceeds Crohn’s disease (CD) incidence, but over time the UC:CD incidence ratio approximates 1. Aims To examine changes in UC:CD incidence ratios across epidemiologic stages. Methods Stage classifications were previously determined by machine-learning classifier applied to data from 522 population-based studies of 82 countries (1920–2024). Population-weighted mean incidence (excluding zeros) was used to calculate annual, country-specific UC:CD ratios. Ratios were analyzed using a generalized additive model for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), accounting for overdispersion and skewness, with pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Bonferroni correction for between-stage comparisons. Average annual percent changes (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each country within each stage. AAPCs were pooled by meta-analysis within stages. Outliers were defined using the Tukey method and are presented separately. Results The GAMLSS model, adjusted for country, showed significant effects of epidemiologic stage on UC:CD incidence ratios (p<0.001), highlighting a progressive shift toward a 1:1 ratio (Figure 1). Significant differences were found between stages: Stage 1: Median: 3.62 (IQR: 3.9 [1.66–5.56]); Stage 2: Median: 1.8 (IQR: 2 [1.12–3.12]); Stage 3: Median: 1.56 (IQR: 1 [1.08–2.08]); all comparisons: p<0.001. Meta-analyses supported these results, decreasing in stages 1 and 2 before stabilizing in stage 3: Stage 1 (13 countries, 1954–2022) AAPC: −4.77 (95%CI: −8.59, −0.95); stage 2 (42 countries, 1952–2022) AAPC: −2.55 (95%CI: −4.04, −1.06); stage 3 (24 countries, 1970–2023) AAPC: −0.12 (95%CI: −0.66, 0.42). Outliers (n=81; 7.8%) were primarily observed in Asia and northern latitudes (Table 1) (eg, China, Faroe Islands). Conclusions The UC:CD incidence ratio significantly decreases during stage 1 and 2, then stabilizes in stage 3. Recognising stage-specific changes in the UC and CD incidence may clarify the epidemiologic evolution of IBD and guide research into environmental and diagnostic determinants. A272 Table 1: UC:CD Incidence Ratio Outliers Funding Agencies CIHRThe Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; International Organization for the study Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Windsor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: