Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey shows job satisfaction mediates the link between HRM practices and organizational commitment, indicating its importance.
This study investigates the influence of job satisfaction on the relationship between organizational commitment and Human Resource Management (HRM) practices. Using a cross-sectional survey of 220 employees across various departments and roles, data were collected on HRM constructs such as recruitment and selection, training, rewards and recognition, performance appraisal satisfaction, and work environment. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and bootstrapping were employed to test direct and indirect effects. Results revealed that all HRM practices significantly enhanced organizational commitment, with path coefficients ranging from 0.44 to 0.55. Job satisfaction emerged as a strong mediator, showing the highest indirect effects through rewards and recognition (0.28, p = 0.001), work environment (0.33, p = 0.003), and training (0.30, p = 0.002). Moreover, job satisfaction had a substantial direct effect on organizational commitment (0.65, p < 0.001). Reliability and validity were confirmed through Cronbach’s Alpha values (0.80–0.88) and model fit indices (CFI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0.04, SRMR = 0.05). Overall, the findings provide empirical evidence that job satisfaction is the key link between HRM practices and organizational outcomes, emphasizing the strategic importance of fostering employee satisfaction through supportive HR policies and conducive work environments to enhance long-term commitment and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sareddy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: