Four preregistered studies explore how symbolic actions deepen group identification and boost charitable donations.
Publicly broadcasting one's support for a social cause is often maligned as ‘slacktivism’. We investigate whether such symbolic action by advantaged group members in support of the cause of a disadvantaged group can motivate more concrete collective action when it solidifies a sense of belonging to a common cause. Across four preregistered studies (total N = 1204), voluntary (Studies 2 and 3), but not involuntary (Studies 1 and 4) symbolic action by advantaged group members increased opinion‐based identification as part of a cause. This change in identification predicted increased collective action intentions and collective action in the form of donating to relevant charities. Moreover, in Study 3 we also found a significant indirect effect of symbolic action on collective action via increased identification. A competing hypothesis, that symbolic action might demotivate further action by reducing collective guilt, was not supported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bingley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: