This afterword examines social rights' historical roots and their decline in the context of market forces, suggesting a need for reconnection to democracy.
This Afterword builds on Nehal Bhuta’s Foreword by revisiting the intellectual and historical underpinnings of social rights, particularly their emergence in the nineteenth century through solidarist political philosophy. It argues that solidarism, unlike both liberal individualism and Marxist collectivism, envisioned the political community as grounded in spontaneous social bonds of mutual responsibility rather than in contracts or class struggle. The Afterword further explores how social rights were historically entangled with capitalism, noting that while originally conceived to counterbalance market forces, their efficacy is now weakened by the neoliberal transformation of civil and political rights. Contemporary market dynamics—exemplified by gig economy practices—threaten to erode the emancipatory potential of social rights. Unless social rights are reconnected to democratic principles and the material conditions of political participation, they risk losing relevance in the face of growing inequality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graziella Romeo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: