This analysis explores personal identity across prenatal and postnatal stages, suggesting a new conceptual framework.
When does a human being begin? In the recent academic debate propelled by Elselijn Kingma, the fetus is conceived as either a substance being contained in or as a part of the pregnant organism, or as a process produced by another process. If a human being begins to exist earlier than at birth, how does prenatal existence relate to postnatal existence in terms of fetus and person? In this paper, I argue that neither the substance view nor the process view can account for the structure of becoming of a single being. In two steps, I present a new model called the substantive survival view: I take from Derrida the notion of survival (traces of the past continuously informing the present), and from Harman the notion of substance (a thing irreducible to its components and effects). I argue that from the very outset, the subject must be subjected to alterity, the possibility of becoming a person in the ongoing process of becoming informed by the past, which survives in modified form as traces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niels Wilde Langballe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: