PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026Clinical Infectious Diseases2 citations

Overview of 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk assessment using clinical scoring systems in children and adults

View Full Paper
MBMiriam B. BarshakJLJeffrey A. LinderMWMichael E Watson

Key Points

  • This update aims to assess the effectiveness of clinical scoring systems for diagnosing group A streptococcal pharyngitis.
  • Systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies
  • Comparison of clinical scoring systems to clinician judgement
  • Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in children and adults
  • Clinical scoring systems show comparable or slightly higher accuracy than clinician judgement alone
  • Recommendations favor the use of scoring systems in evaluating sore throat patients
  • Evidence is limited due to small study sizes and lack of consistent outcomes

Abstract

Abstract This publication represents the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Diagnosis of GAS pharyngitis by clinician judgement alone is unreliable, and universal testing incurs cost and inconvenience for individuals at low risk of having GAS infection. Clinical scoring systems have been used to quantify the probability of a positive GAS throat culture based on standardized criteria such as the presence of fever; tonsillar enlargement or exudate; tender and enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes; and the absence of cough. The goal of this manuscript is to review the evidence and provide a recommendation as to whether a scoring system should be used to decide which patients should have a GAS diagnostic test (i.e., rapid antigen test (RADT), molecular method, and/or throat culture) performed. We performed a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized studies that compared the use of a clinical scoring system to clinician judgement alone in predicting the result of a throat culture. Evidence from studies in children and adults suggests the diagnostic accuracy is comparable or slightly higher using a scoring system compared to clinician judgement alone. Although the studies are limited due to small size, lack of uniformity in outcome measures, and incomplete data, the consensus of the panel is that the balance of benefits and harms favors incorporation of a clinical scoring system as part of the evaluation of patients with sore throat and suspected GAS pharyngitis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barshak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a768ecb39a600b3ed136https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 12025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Group A Streptococcal (GAS) Pharyngitis: Risk assessment using clinical scoring systems in children and adults2025
  2. 2Group A Streptococcus pharyngitis in Children: New Perspectives on Rapid Diagnostic Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship2024 · 10 citations
  3. 3Fifteen-minute consultation: Group A streptococcal pharyngitis, diagnosis and treatment in children2024
  4. 46768 Introducing point of care testing for group A strep in a children’s emergency department, during an epidemic2024
  5. 5Appropriateness of Use of Streptococcal Pharyngitis Testing and Associated Antibiotic Prescribing in the Urgent Care Setting2024 · 1 citations