Compares modulation formats and turbulence-mitigation strategies to improve FSO link reliability, suggesting effective combinations.
Although FSO communication provides high data-rate, license-free links, atmospheric turbulence causes deep fades and irradiance scintillation that significantly reduce reliability. This study compares four modulation formats (OOK, 4-PPM, DPSK, and DCO-OFDM) and two turbulence-mitigation strategies: adaptive optics (AO) and dynamic beam steering (DBS). It also presents a simulation-based performance evaluation of an IM/DD FSO link over a Gamma–Gamma turbulence channel. The results of Monte-Carlo evaluation for a 1550-nm, 1-km link under very strong turbulence <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mrow> <m:mfenced close=")" open="(" separators="|"> <m:mrow> <m:msubsup> <m:mi>C</m:mi> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msubsup> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>5</m:mn> <m:mo>×</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mn>10</m:mn> <m:mrow> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mn>14</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mtext> </m:mtext> <m:msup> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">m</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>/</m:mo> <m:mn>3</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:mrow> </m:math> (Cₙ²=5× 10⁻¹⁴0.17emm-2/3) show that DPSK outperforms OOK (≈4.1 × 10 −3 at 20 dB) by achieving BER = 4.2 × 10 −5 at 20 dB and <10 −6 at 30 dB. With DBS using four spatial paths, realistic operation under estimation error achieves BER ≈ 8 × 10 −5 at 20 dB and 9 × 10 −6 at 30 dB, indicating substantial diversity gain. AO modeled with a residual factor η AO = 0.3 yields moderate gains (BER ≈ 9.5 × 10 −4 at 20 dB). In general, the most dependable design for high-speed FSO links in turbulent atmospheric conditions combines spatial diversity (DBS) and robust modulation (DPSK).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishaq et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: