This article examines cognitive complexity's role in economic infrastructure, suggesting implications for capital variations.
This article offers an ontodynamic interpretation of contemporary technological capitalism within the framework of metamonism. It is argued that the expansion of capital into high-technology domains is structurally impossible without the formation of a cognitively complex subject capable of abstraction, tolerance of uncertainty, and autonomous differentiation. Freedom of thought is examined not as a humanistic value, but as a functional economic infrastructure enabling continuous production of variability (Diff). Subsequently, this same freedom is deconstructed as a form of high-frequency Lógos capture: capital does not liberate difference but accelerates its alienation and commodification. Authoritarianism and liberal capitalism are analyzed as distinct frequency regimes of Lógos — low-frequency and high-frequency — both colonial with respect to Mónos. In the concluding section, an ontodynamic tactic for the node is proposed: not the search for an alternative system, but local non-recognizability as the limit of profiling. Mónos is conceived not as a territory or state, but as a temporary failure of recognition — an event that escapes circulation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrii Myshko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: