PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 19, 2026SAGE Open Nursing0 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Blood Pressure Control on Prognosis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke After Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
JCJie ChenYGYing GaoWZWei Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how different blood pressure management strategies influence 90-day outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients post-thrombectomy.
  • Systematic search of interventional studies from major databases until April 2025.
  • Dual-reviewer screening identified eligible studies using predefined criteria.
  • Methodological quality assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
  • Data extracted and analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis (RevMan 5.1).
  • No significant benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering on functional recovery, mortality, or neurological outcomes.
  • Subgroup analyses showed that lower systolic blood pressure was linked to better functional independence.
  • Higher blood pressure levels correlated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage and mortality.

Abstract

Introduction Blood pressure control is critical in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy. Fluctuations in blood pressure can compromise cerebral reperfusion and influence 90-day functional prognosis. However, the relationship between blood pressure and prognosis remains unclear. Objective To examine the impact of blood pressure control strategies on 90-day functional prognosis, intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke following thrombectomy. Method We systematically searched major Chinese/English databases up to April 2025 for interventional studies on post-thrombectomy blood pressure management in acute ischemic stroke. Dual-reviewer screening with predefined criteria identified eligible studies. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool assessed methodological quality. Data extraction and random-effects meta-analysis (RevMan 5.1) evaluated pooled risk ratios (95% confidence intervals), with heterogeneity quantified via I 2 statistics. Results This meta-analysis of 12 studies ( n = 4,794) found no significant benefit of intensive over standard blood pressure lowering in functional recovery, hemorrhagic risk, mortality, or early neurological outcomes post-thrombectomy. However, subgroup analyses revealed critical associations: lower systolic blood pressure correlated with functional independence (−4.46 mmHg), while elevated levels were linked to intracranial hemorrhage (+6.55 mmHg) and mortality (+3.12 mmHg). Conclusion The meta-analysis findings suggest that individualized blood pressure thresholds, rather than uniform intensive control, may optimize postintervention outcomes, warranting further prospective validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6996a7ffecb39a600b3ee3cahttps://doi.org/10.1177/23779608261420469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper