Innovative system enhances real-time evaluation of course-level learning outcomes, suggesting improvements for higher education.
Real-time monitoring and dynamic optimization of course-level learning outcomes (CLOs) are crucial for improving the quality of higher education, yet traditional evaluation systems face challenges such as data centralization, poor real-time performance, lack of trustworthiness, and inefficient feedback loops. To address these issues, this study proposes a blockchain-enabled smart-contract ecosystem for CLOs management. First, we design a multi-layered ecosystem architecture, including the perception layer, blockchain layer, smart contract layer, application layer, and user layer, to realize full-process automation and trustworthiness of CLOs management. Second, we formalize the CLOs evaluation index system and design a dynamic weight calculation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy weight method, which is encapsulated into smart contracts to realize real-time and objective evaluation of learning outcomes. Third, we propose a feedback-driven dynamic improvement mechanism, where smart contracts automatically trigger targeted teaching adjustment suggestions based on real-time evaluation results. The proposed ecosystem is implemented on the Ethereum blockchain, and experiments are conducted with 3 undergraduate courses from two universities involving 523 students. Objective experimental results show that the ecosystem achieves a data transmission delay of 0.8-1.2 seconds, a data tamper-proof rate of 100%, and an evaluation accuracy of 92.3% compared with manual evaluation. Subjective evaluation results from teachers and students indicate that the ecosystem significantly improves the timeliness of teaching feedback (89.7% positive evaluation) and the effectiveness of learning outcome improvement ( 86.3% positive evaluation). This study provides a new technical solution for real-time and trusted management of CLOs, and contributes to the digital transformation of higher education evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiaowei Nie (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: