Retrospective analysis of SIRT efficacy in HCC suggests durable control and safety in patients.
Background: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with yttrium-90 microspheres has become an established locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, real-world data on clinical outcomes, including efficacy, safety, and prognostic determinants, remain limited. Methods: This study retrospectively analysed 56 patients with radiologically and/or histologically confirmed HCC who underwent SIRT at a tertiary referral centre. Baseline demographics, clinical information, tumour characteristics, procedural data, and follow-up outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included radiological response (mRECIST), histological necrosis, and treatment-related toxicity. Prognostic pathways were explored using structural equation modelling (SEM). Results: The mean age at the beginning of SIRT was 65.0 ± 11.6 years; most patients were male (87.5%) and had preserved liver function (mean ALBI −2.9 ± 0.4). BCLC staging distribution was 50% stage A, 32.1% stage B, and 17.9% stage C. According to mRECIST criteria at 6 months, 15.2% achieved complete response (CR), 47.8% partial response (PR), 30% stable disease (SD), and 7% progressive disease (PD). Median OS was 19 months (12–32) for BCLC stage A, 28 months (3–42) for stage B, and 19 months (12–56) for stage C (log-rank p = 0.743). SEM identified diffuse tumour morphology as the most significant predictor of poor prognosis. Radical treatments were performed in 28% of patients, including four liver transplants and ten resections. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients, of which 7 were Clavien–Dindo grade I and 4 were grade II. Conclusions: In this real-world HCC group, SIRT provided durable tumour control and survival with excellent tolerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ergenc et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: