Key result
Optimal ARR cut-offs for primary aldosteronism screening increase with age to yield high diagnostic accuracy.
Why the study?
This study sought to establish age-specific optimal cut-off values for the aldosterone-to-renin ratio in screening for primary aldosteronism.
Does the optimal aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) cut-off for primary aldosteronism screening vary by age?
Does the optimal aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) cut-off for primary aldosteronism screening vary by age?
The optimal ARR cut-off for primary aldosteronism screening increases with age, suggesting a cut-off of 2.4 for patients under 50 and 3.7 for those 50 or older provides superior diagnostic performance.
May warrant age-adjusted ARR thresholds for PA screening; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
This study sought to establish age‐specific optimal cut‐off values for the aldosterone‐to‐renin ratio (ARR) in screening for primary aldosteronism (PA). The analysis included 281 patients with confirmed PA and 1242 with essential hypertension (EH), categorized into four age groups: ≤39, 40–49, 50–59, and ≥60 years. A positive correlation was observed between ARR and age in both patient groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the optimal ARR cut‐offs to be 2.3, 2.8, 3.1, and 3.6 for the respective age groups, with all demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy. Further evaluation revealed that for patients under 50‐years‐old, a unified ARR cut‐off of 2.4 provided high sensitivity and specificity, while for patients aged 50 or older, a cut‐off of 3.7 was more appropriate. In conclusion, the optimal ARR cut‐off for PA screening increases with age, and we recommend using a value of 2.4 for patients under 50 and 3.7 for those aged 50 or older to achieve superior diagnostic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question. Optimal aldosterone-renin ratio cut-offs for primary aldosteronism screening increase with age: 2.4 for under 50s and 3.7 for 50+ yield high diagnostic accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: