Experiments show Escherichia coli motility influences neutrophils to switch between responses, suggesting crosstalk with flagellin cues.
Flagellar motility provides bacterial pathogens with a key evolutionary advantage in navigating heterogeneous host environments and evading immune clearance. Yet how motility influences bacterial spread in physically confined tissue-like spaces has remained unclear. Using a microfluidic platform that recapitulates narrow constrictions, we discovered that motile Escherichia coli penetrated deep into confined crevices, whereas non-motile mutants lacking flagella failed to colonize these regions. Co-incubation with human neutrophils revealed striking functional plasticity in the immune response. Against motile bacteria in confinement, neutrophils extended hyper-elongated pseudopodia (20–150 μm) to pursue them into narrow crevices. By contrast, in the absence of confinement, neutrophils produced neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) against both motile and non-motile bacteria. Thus, the mechanical environment governed a switch between pseudopod response and NET release. This switch was further mediated by bacterial flagellin acting through Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5): inhibition of TLR5 abolished the plasticity, inducing a default NET response. Perturbing host actin polymerization or myosin II contractility biased neutrophils toward one outcome or the other, implicating a balance between front-end actin extension and rear contractility in regulating the decision. Together, these findings show that bacterial motility enables penetration of confined physical barriers, while neutrophils integrate flagellin-derived cues with cytoskeletal regulation to toggle between exploratory pseudopodia and pro-inflammatory NETs. This work reveals a previously unrecognized form of host-pathogen crosstalk, in which flagellar propulsion influences bacterial access to various niches as well as the mode of neutrophil response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pushkar Lele (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: