Mixed-methods study models empathy-self-discovery paradox in Gen Z, suggesting social media amplifies narcissistic behaviors.
This study investigates the resurgence of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) among Generation Z, theorizing its popularity as a social code that both reveals and responds to a contemporary "empathy-self-discovery paradox" with correlates to narcissistic personality traits. We posit that the MBTI's function as an identity marker fulfills needs for belonging while simultaneously enabling a curated, performative self-presentation aligned with subclinical narcissistic dynamics, such as external validation-seeking and identity fragmentation. Framed within theories of consumer sociology, the Barnum Effect, and neurocognitive models of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), we argue the online MBTI phenomenon amplifies a conflict between the genuine exploration of self and the instrumental use of identity for social capital. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, we synthesize findings from neuroimaging and clinical literature on empathy deficits in NPD with a novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. The ANN analyzes behavioral data to map the non-linear relationships between social media engagement, MBTI usage, and outcomes like self-discovery, socialization, and MBTI popularity. Results indicate social media interaction is the strongest driver of MBTI popularity, reflecting its role in narcissistic supply. Crucially, self-discovery shows a non-linear relationship with engagement, peaking at moderate levels before declining, suggesting excessive use may foster a shallow, labels-based identity congruent with narcissistic identity diffusion. By bridging neuropsychological insights on NPD with computational modeling of social behavior, this work provides a novel framework for understanding how digital platforms can cultivate identity markets that resonate with and potentially exacerbate narcissistic psychosocial patterns in vulnerable populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chengze Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: