PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Energy Research & Social Science5 citationsOpen Access

Minerals at the margins and the new geopolitics of critical minerals

View Full Paper
RDRaphael DeberdtJDJessica DiCarlo

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the emerging importance of critical minerals beyond current mainstream resources and the geopolitical implications.
  • Analyzed the global landscape of critical minerals and their strategic importance.
  • Outlined the challenges posed by current dependencies on technologies from specific regions.
  • Discussed policy recommendations for Western and OECD countries to diversify and strengthen resources.
  • Identified lesser-known minerals with strategic potential for future technologies.
  • Emphasized the necessity for a more comprehensive approach to understanding critical resources.
  • Highlighted that complete decoupling from dominant powers like China is impractical, advocating for collaborative strategies.

Abstract

The new resource geopolitics is not solely a race against China; it is a test of foresight, adaptability, and the ability to invest in futures not yet fully visible across the full spectrum of ‘critical’ resources. While Western powers rush to counter China's dominance in mainstream critical minerals —such as rare earths, lithium, and cobalt—policy, research, and public attention tend to overlook minerals at the margins : materials recognized as critical and with emerging strategic importance that are already mined and refined largely within member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). These minerals, though peripheral today, have the potential to underpin the next generation of disruptive technologies. In this perspective, we outline a new resource geopolitics in which Western and OECD countries mobilize existing strengths to future-proof dependencies. The objective is not to downplay current vulnerabilities but to advance a more holistic understanding of criticality, one that looks beyond today's technological and defense imperatives. Complete decoupling is neither feasible nor desirable, and zero-sum competition offers little value in an era of planetary crisis. What is possible, however, is a rebalancing of dependencies through strategic foresight, diversification, and the cultivation of underrecognized advantages.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deberdt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994ad4873532290d01f22dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104601
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper