Demonstrates antifungal efficacy in apples using chitosan-inorganic oxide nanocomposites, suggesting a sustainable alternative to fungicides.
Phytopathogenic fungi pose a critical threat to global food security through substantial pre- and post-harvest crop losses, intensified by climate change and fungicide resistance. To address this, we synthesized low-concentration chitosan–inorganic oxide nanocomposites (CS-SiO2, CS-ZnO, CS-CuO) via ionic gelation, a green and scalable method. Comprehensive characterization (DLS, UV-Vis, FTIR, XRD, SEM) confirmed nanocomposite formation, CS-SiO2 exhibited uniform particle sizes (200–250 nm), while CS-CuO showed slightly larger particles, all with excellent dispersity. Zeta potential analysis confirmed strong colloidal stability, with pure chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) displaying a surface charge of +12.9 mV, while all nanocomposites retained positive charges, enhancing adhesion to negatively charged fungal membranes. In vitro antifungal assays against Alternaria alternata, Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum graminicola, and Fusarium graminearum demonstrated hierarchical efficacy: CS-CuO > CS-ZnO > CS-SiO2, with CS-CuO achieving >80% growth inhibition against B. cinerea and A. alternata. SEM revealed severe hyphal damage and spore collapse in CS-CuO-treated fungi, attributed to synergistic reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and chitosan-mediated membrane disruption. In vivo trials on B. cinerea-infected apples showed CS-CuO reduced lesion area by 81% and elevated host defense markers, including a 1.5-fold increase in total phenolic content and higher DPPH radical scavenging activity compared to controls. These nanocomposites, particularly CS-CuO, offer a sustainable, dual-action solution direct antifungal activity and enhanced host resilience while minimizing environmental impact. By integrating scalable synthesis, eco-compatibility, and efficacy, this work advances chitosan–inorganic oxide nanocomposites as viable alternatives to conventional fungicides, with immediate potential for agricultural and postharvest applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: