Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interactive teleoperation enables real-time control of a robotic arm, suggesting a low-cost solution for manipulation tasks.
Interactive teleoperation offers an intuitive pathway for human–robot interaction, yet many existing systems rely on dedicated sensors or wearable devices, limiting accessibility and scalability. This paper presents a vision-based teleoperation framework that enables real-time control of an articulated robotic arm (five joints plus a gripper actuator) using human hand tracking from a single, typical laptop camera. Hand pose and gesture information are extracted using a real-time landmark estimation pipeline, and a set of compact kinematic descriptors—palm position, apparent hand scale, wrist rotation, hand pitch, and pinch gesture—are mapped to robotic joint commands through a calibration-based control strategy. Commands are transmitted over a lightweight network interface to an embedded controller that executes synchronized servo actuation. To enhance stability and usability, temporal smoothing and rate-limited updates are employed to mitigate jitter while preserving responsiveness. In a human-in-the-loop evaluation with 42 participants, the system achieved an 88% success rate (37/42), with a completion time of 53.48 ± 18.51 s, a placement error of 6.73 ± 3.11 cm for successful trials (n = 37), and an ease-of-use score of 2.67 ± 1.20 on a 1–5 scale. Results indicate that the proposed approach enables feasible interactive teleoperation without specialized hardware, supporting its potential as a low-cost platform for robotic manipulation, education, and rapid prototyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drăgoi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: