Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates calibration method for seismic acceleration estimation in Romania, suggesting improved earthquake early warning systems.
Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems based on on-site measurements enable ultra-rapid alerts by exploiting the time gap between the arrival of P-waves and the subsequent damaging S-waves. A central challenge is the reliable estimation of impending ground motion using only the earliest portion of the signal. This study investigates a site-specific methodology based on the S/P amplitude ratio for near-real-time seismic acceleration estimation at the Iași stations, Romania, in a region dominated by Vrancea intermediate-depth seismicity. Using 50 strong-motion records from the European Strong-Motion (ESM) database, a local calibration coefficient of k = PGA_S/PGA_P = 6.2 was derived for the Iași area, consistent with its soft-soil conditions and with values reported for comparable sedimentary environments worldwide. A regional analysis confirms that the S/P ratio is primarily governed by local site effects, requiring station-level calibration. The methodology was experimentally validated through shaking-table tests using real P-wave recordings. Predicted S-wave peak ground accelerations exhibit no systematic bias, with a median relative error of +2.0% and dispersion consistent with the intrinsic log-normal variability of the S/P ratio. The results demonstrate that a locally calibrated S/P ratio provides a robust and physically grounded basis for rapid seismic acceleration estimation in on-site EEW systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Temneanu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: