Comparative analysis reveals distinct characteristics of ST11-KL25 and ST11-KL64 hypervirulent strains, suggesting targeted strategies.
Hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (hv-CRKP) poses a significant challenge in healthcare settings due to its combination of high virulence and multidrug resistance. In China, ST11 is the predominant lineage, with KL64 and the recently identified KL25 as key capsular subtypes. The clinical and genomic characteristics of ST11-KL25 remain insufficiently characterized. A total of 239 hv-CRKP isolates collected from 2020 to 2023 were analyzed. Molecular typing, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, and phenotypic assays were used to compare the epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, and virulence traits of ST11-KL25 and ST11-KL64. Clinical data were reviewed to assess infection characteristics. ST11 accounted for 87.9% (210/239) of hv-CRKP isolates. Among ST11 isolates, KL64 (54.7%, 104/190) and KL25 (45.3%, 86/190) were the predominant capsular types. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that ST11-KL25 may have originated from KL64 through capsular switching, with increasing prevalence after 2021. Both sublineages exhibited extensive drug resistance; however, ST11-KL64 showed broader resistance, including higher rates of ceftazidime-avibactam and polymyxin resistance. Phenotypically, ST11-KL25 demonstrated greater competitive fitness and biofilm formation, while ST11-KL64 displayed higher in vivo virulence in the Galleria mellonella model. ST11-KL25 and ST11-KL64 exhibit distinct adaptation strategies within hv-CRKP. KL25 seems to be a stable, colonization-adapted subtype with consistent resistance and moderate virulence, while KL64 is more invasive, with broader resistance and higher virulence. Subtype-specific surveillance and intervention are essential to limit their spread and protect patient and public health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: