Mathematical analysis recovers elapsed time from porous medium equation in specified conditions, suggesting a new approach for time retrieval.
Consider the Porous Medium Equation <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mo>∂</m:mo> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {∂ₜu=Δ uγ} subject to homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition, where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>γ</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {γ>1} is known as the polytropic exponent. Given the values of γ and the solution <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {u(Tₑ)} at a sufficiently large but unknown time <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Tₑ} , in this paper we provide an explicit formula for recovering the elapsed time <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Tₑ} , without any knowledge of the initial data. Our method is based on an asymptotic inequality satisfied by <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {u(Tₑ)} and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Tₑ} that leads to an asymptotic stability estimate for <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Tₑ} , allowing us to recover it as the global minimizer of some function. We finally validate our results numerically in two and three dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karakazian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: