This analysis demonstrates well-posedness of the vacuum free boundary problem in cylindrical Euler equations, implying unique local solutions.
In this article, we consider the well-posedness of the local smooth solutions to the physical vacuum free boundary problem of the cylindrical symmetric Euler equations with time-dependent damping <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> <m:mi>ρ</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="bold">u</m:mi> </m:math> -{μ }{{(1+t)}λ}ρ {u} , <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:math> μ > 0 , and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:math> λ > 0 . In this case, the free boundary is moving in the radial direction and the radial velocity will affect the angular velocity, but the axial velocity can be explicitly expressed by <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> ω ={ω }₀{(1+t)}-μ when <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:math> λ =1 and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> </m:mstyle> <m:mrow> <m:mo>[</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mrow> <m:mo>]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> ω ={ω }₀{e}^{μ /1-λ [1-{(1+t)}1-λ]} when <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo>≠</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:math> λ ≠ 1 . Thus, when <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mn>0</m:mn> <m:mo><</m:mo> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo><</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:math> 0< λ < 1 , <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:math> ω converges to 0 as <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>t</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> t→ +∞ , and when <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:math> λ > 1 , <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:math> ω converges to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mstyle displaystyle="false"> <m:mfrac> <m:mrow> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>1</m:mn> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mfrac> </m:mstyle> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {ω }₀{e}μ /1-λ as <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>t</m:mi> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mo>+</m:mo> <m:mi>∞</m:mi> </m:math> t→ +∞ . This is essentially different from the case of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>μ</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:math> μ =1 , <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>λ</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:math> λ =0 in (Meng-Mai-Mei, JDE, 2022), whose axial velocity is only expressed by <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>ω</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>e</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>−</m:mo> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> ω ={ω }₀{e}⁻ᵗ . Moreover, at the moving boundary, the compressible Euler equations with time-dependent damping become a degenerate hyperbolic system. Thanks to the Hardy-type inequality and cut-off functions, we choose a suitable weighted Sobolev spaces to construct a priori estimates to overcome the degeneracy of the system in the Lagrangian coordinates, which confirms the existence of local smooth solution. Gronwall’s inequality guarantees the uniqueness of local smooth solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: